Is the topic relevant and interesting? Does it relate to our audience? 1 2 3 4
Yes, it is interesting to mainly guys, it relates to my audience. 4

Is the story angle clearly defined? Is it unique? 1 2 3 4
Yes, for xbox, fairly unigue. 4

Is the stand-up informative and creative? Does it lead into the story? 1 2 3 4
stand up could have been better creativity wise. it does lead the story. 3

Are the interviews important to the story? Experts? Restate question? 1 2 3 4
The interviews are important to the story, they are just normal people. two restate the question. 4

Are transitions smooth and informative? Sequence makes sense? 1 2 3 4
Transitions could have been better but are still pretty smooth 3

Does the story make sense? Does the A-Roll drive the story? 1 2 3 4
The story makes sense, the a roll does well to drive story along. 4

Do the camera shots add to the story? B-roll? Correct shots? 1 2 3 4
the camera adds to the story, b roll could be better, the shots are correct. 4

Is sound used to enhance story? Music? Natural sound? 1 2 3 4
sound was not very good, no music, lots of natural sound. but it was tough to hear everything. 3

Is the editing clean? Graphics? Sound? Transitions? 1 2 3 4
editing could havebeen better, couldnt get the split second so you can hear things i didnt want to. 3

Is the story the proper time length? 1 2 3 4
one minute five seconds 4
Total ____/40


Beattie: Good length, funny at the end, used more b roll.
Bierbaum: nice job with the interviews, good b roll. interviews seemed to go fast.
Chareonjitt: good use of b roll. good interviews. sound was quiet.
Hassan: good interviews. interesting content, stand up was very dark.
Hengel: good b roll, good use of graphics, graphics distracting with name changes
Hernandez:interviews were good, stand up was well done, A roll could be better
Hoffman: good interviews, good graphics, b roll was creative but needed more.
Johnson:good interviews, good graphics, a roll needed work
Kent:good a roll.good people interview, rule of thirds was not taken to full extent
Keohavong: interviews, good people interviewed, editing could be better.
Kerber: good b roll. good interviews. couldnt understand a roll
Krueger: good interviews, good b roll, stand up kinda far away.
Kuhn: good interviews, good graphic, noisy stand up with background noise.
McAlpine: good interviews, good stand up, interview was off to the side, not in front
Meckley: good b roll, good stand up, a roll could be stronger.
Ostenson:
Pederson:good interviews, b roll was good, stronger a roll
Rafi: good use of graphics, good b roll, effects were distracting.
Rice: good interviews, good b roll, use the rule of thirds
Robatka: